
How do you lose R7 billion in a day?
July 23, 2008
In a world where time is money, how much is six hours worth in trading terms?
Recently, a computer glitch that hit the JSE cost the market an estimated R 7 billion. A journalist from The Times, Robert Laing reported that the problem was picked up at 6h30am and was resolved at 3h10pm. What kind of system glitch takes nine hours to fix? One that should not be repeated.
As an advocate for online commerce and the joys of digital dollars, the crash of Africa’s economic stock-trading powerhouse came as a serious loophole in my argument for e-trade. While e-commerce has tangible trade benefits, for example instant exchange with international traders, immediate access to information regarding market changes and a convenient means of raising revenue in a short-term period, there are also tangible difficulties. For example, a single system glitch can bring the country’s trading share tumbling down, somewhat like a house of cards.
If the biggest trading house in Africa can lose over R 7-billion (from an average of R12 billion to R5 billion) in a day despite extending office hours to 7pm, how can the investors recoup the losses? Unless, they have a few millions sitting around to invest in shares and buy international stocks - they don’t.
Potential stock traders may be put off by the high risk involved in trading, market volatility and trading jargon. Investors sceptical about JSE trading may revert to lower risk investment likes such as property, business assets and government stocks and bonds. But the JSE’s draw card is potentially fast returns on short-term investments. Technical glitches are the last thing our economy needs.
The link between economic power and digital communication could be our greatest advantage but also our biggest shackle. The world trade system could not exist were it not for developments in Information and Communicaton Technologies (ICT’s). However, the stock market is as volatile as the network on which it hinges. The implications for traders could be greater hesitance in investing on the market, considering South Africa’s increasing inflation, plummeting bank stocks and low all share index.
Several notable points spring from the crash.
- We live in a very small world. The US economic plunge has affected the international economic arena and increased global inflation. The Times reported that a Johannes burg based trader said, “The market is growing more and more nervous that problems in the US mortgage sector are going to trouble the global economy.” Two US mortgage financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been tapping into international investor potential to create a safety net for the US mortgage market. They’ve been greeted with scepticism because investors are hesitant to dedicate more funds to the US economy.
- A glitch in one part of the system may send shockwaves into the world. The global capitalist economy is structured so that trading is highly competitive, but countries form an interdependent network. On the 15th July, the day of the JSE crash, The Times reported that the world markets fell 1.32% by 11h25am. By the end of the day, “Anglo American was up 3.4 percent and BHP Billiton was up 4%,” says a source from Nedbank Securities. The global market is highly volatile and most market, especially those of developing countries, are sensitive to market changes. The big (capitalist) dogs still reap from trade movements - positive or negative.
- Learning from disaster is a key success strategy. Chief executive officer of JSE Limited, Russell Loubser, says the JSE crash was caused by network failure, not the exchange’s trading system. He added, “I suppose we have to realise that even the best systems can go wrong. Nasa lost a space shuttle or two and they are the best.” Loubser is right. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Nasa) lost a seven-member crew in Space Shuttle Columbia in 2003 and Space Shuttle Challenger in 1986. But in both cases, engineers discovered where the problems lay. The post-mortem anaysis revealed Space Shuttle Columbia crashed because a wing broke and Space Shuttle Challenger, exploded because of booster failure. The precise technicalities of the JSE system failure are still unknown. One similarity between the incidents is learning the lessons of disaster management. Econarch Data Centre Services operational director, Craig Jones says “Disaster recovery is always a learning experience. There is no way to foresee every eventuality.” The JSE will have to review its impact assessment, and decide whether this kind of failure is now worth the cost.
- Don’t crack your eggs too soon. In international trade relations, caution is key. The JSE network crash came two weeks after a JSE fee-reduction of 7.5% because of growing trading volumes. Traders, who were probably delighted at the initial decision, said the surplus value could have been used to improve the computer system.
- Don’t put all your eggs in one basket - try three baskets. In late 2007, the JSE brought its IT function back in-house after two years of outsourcing to Accenture. Analysts say the decision had no bearing on therecent crash as the bourse’s CIO, Riaan van Bamelen, was well equipped to deal with the issue at hand. General Manager for service delivery at Continuity SA, Mark Beverly, argues that the JSE would have done a risk mitigation exercise. Had inspectors identified its network as a risk area they would have built in extra surety features. He says: “To reduce their risk, they should [now] do some kind of duplication of their network infrastructure, which is where their DR site comes in. They can triangulate to it, or they can have multiple [data] feeds into their production site [the JSE itself].”
The last time a crash took place in the JSE was in 1996 (twelve years ago) - not a bad track record considering trading withstood Eskom’s loadshedding and xenophobic attacks in Johannesburg. Still, it would be wise to invest in an alternative safety net plan.












